Cebora EVO 350 TS Synergic vs ESAB Rogue EM 140
Technical comparison · MIG/MAG welding (wire feed)
EVO 350 TS Synergic and Rogue EM 140 are not direct competitors: different use classes (F4 vs F2), very different prices (~4.8×). Rogue EM 140 costs less (~€600) and is the entry-level choice; EVO 350 TS Synergic offers more capability at a higher price (~€2900). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
EVO 350 TS Synergic
Cebora
F4 · Semi-professional
|
Rogue EM 140
ESAB
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2023 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~2600–3200 € | ~550–650 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 61.5 × 97.5 × 90 cm | 22 × 59 × 38.5 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 90 kg | 13.1 kg |
| Power (W) | 15900 W | — |
| Voltage (V) | 400 V | 120 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Welding type | MIG/MAG | MIG/MAG |
| Max wire feed speed (m/min) | 24 m/min | 11.4 m/min |
| Max welding current (A) | 400 A | 140 A |
| Max wire diameter (mm) | 1.2 mm | 0.9 mm |
| Duty cycle (rated current) (%) | 40 % | 30 % |
| Synergic control | True | False |
| Gasless capable | True | True |
| Power source technology | Transformer | Inverter |
| Aluminium ready | True | True |
| Pulse capable | False | False |
| Input voltage | Dual voltage | — |
| Supported spool | Ø300 mm (~15 kg) | Ø200 mm (~5 kg) |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system does not rely on external or cloud-based software, operating entirely through an integrated digital control board. This interface manages pre-saved synergic curves for various alloys (mild steel, stainless steel, aluminum, CuSi3 brazing) and allows direct panel adjustment of advanced welding parameters such as post-gas, soft start, and burn-back. | — |
The differences that matter
- Price: EVO 350 TS Synergic 2900 € vs Rogue EM 140 600 € — Rogue EM 140 wins (+383%)
- Max wire feed speed: EVO 350 TS Synergic 24 m/min vs Rogue EM 140 11.4 m/min — EVO 350 TS Synergic wins (+111%)
- Synergic control: EVO 350 TS Synergic yes, Rogue EM 140 no
- Max wire diameter: EVO 350 TS Synergic 1.2 mm vs Rogue EM 140 0.9 mm — EVO 350 TS Synergic wins (+33%)
Which one to choose
Choose EVO 350 TS Synergic if…
you value max wire feed speed, synergic control and max wire diameter.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.