Cebora Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic vs Telwin Bimax 140i Synergic
Technical comparison · MIG/MAG welding (wire feed)
Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic and Bimax 140i Synergic are not direct competitors: very different prices (~4.3×). Bimax 140i Synergic costs less (~€315) and is the entry-level choice; Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic offers more capability at a higher price (~€1350). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic
Cebora
F2 · Intermediate
|
Bimax 140i Synergic
Telwin
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1200–1500 € | ~280–350 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 19.6 × 42 × 38 cm | 17.2 × 37.9 × 25.2 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 11 kg | 6.3 kg |
| Power (W) | 2700 W | 2650 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Welding type | MIG/MAG | MIG/MAG |
| Max welding current (A) | 160 A | 140 A |
| Max wire diameter (mm) | 1 mm | 0.9 mm |
| Duty cycle (rated current) (%) | 20 % | 15 % |
| Synergic control | True | True |
| Gasless capable | True | True |
| Power source technology | Inverter | Inverter |
| Aluminium ready | True | True |
| Pulse capable | False | False |
| Input voltage | 230 V (single-phase) | 230 V (single-phase) |
| Supported spool | Ø200 mm (~5 kg) | Ø100 mm (~1 kg) |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The user interface is managed via an LCD panel integrated into the power source, allowing operators to easily view and set key parameters such as wire or gas type, material thickness, current, voltage, and wire speed. The system includes pre-loaded synergic curves for mild steel and flux-cored wire, automatically optimizing the welding arc. Software capabilities can be expanded by purchasing an optional package that unlocks additional specific curves for welding aluminum, stainless steel, and CuSi3 alloys. | The machine is governed by a microprocessor control that manages the synergic logic of the welding process. The user simply selects the thickness of the material to be worked, and the system automatically adjusts the wire speed and the optimal arc voltage. This internal software drastically reduces setup times and prevents configuration errors typical of traditional power sources. There are no interfaces for computer connection, external firmware updates, or wireless connectivity, as the entire digital ecosystem is permanently integrated into the internal electronic board. The system is designed to be autonomous, offering an immediate user experience focused on the stability of the electric arc during real-time operation. |
The differences that matter
- Price: Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic 1350 € vs Bimax 140i Synergic 315 € — Bimax 140i Synergic wins (+329%)
- Max wire diameter: Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic 1 mm vs Bimax 140i Synergic 0.9 mm — Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic wins (+11%)
Which one to choose
Choose Mono Star MIG 1620/M Synergic if…
you value max wire diameter.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.