Photon Mono 4 vs HALOT-MAGE 8K

Technical comparison · Resin 3D printing

In brief

Photon Mono 4 and HALOT-MAGE 8K are two resin 3d printing in a similar class. Choose Photon Mono 4 if price matters more; choose HALOT-MAGE 8K if work area matters more.

Parameter
Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Photon Mono 4 Anycubic F2 · Intermediate
Creality HALOT-MAGE 8K HALOT-MAGE 8K Creality F2 · Intermediate
Identity
Launch year 2024 2023
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price (€) ~180–250 € 419 €
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) 33.3 × 27 × 60.8 cm
Weight (kg) 12 kg
Work area (mm) 153.4 × 87 mm 228 × 128 mm
Z-axis height (mm) 165 mm 230 mm
Power (W) 100 W
Voltage (V) 24 V
Maximum speed 1.17 mm/min 40 mm/s
Declared precision 17 μm 29.7 μm
Category specs
Build area XY (short side) (mm) 87 mm 128 mm
XY resolution (µm) 17 µm 29.7 µm
Light source Mono LCD Mono LCD
Print speed (mm/h) 70.2 mm/h 40 mm/h
Tilt / peel system Standard FEP Standard FEP
Ecosystem
Cloud dependency No No
Software notes The device is fully compatible with the main third-party slicing software options on the market, including widely popular solutions such as Chitubox and Lychee Slicer, alongside the proprietary Anycubic Photon Workshop application. This flexibility allows users to manage advanced exposure parameters, supports, and tolerance compensation without proprietary constraints. File preparation occurs primarily via offline transfer using a USB port, ensuring a stable workflow independent of active network connections. Managing print profiles for various commercial resins is highly intuitive, facilitating the optimization of layer-by-layer curing times for both standard materials and advanced formulations. The system supports the proprietary HALOT BOX ecosystem, developed to optimize digital model transition and support generation. The electronic architecture is fully compatible with widely distributed third-party formats and programs such as CHITUBOX and Lychee Slicer, ensuring workflow flexibility. Connectivity features file transfer via an integrated USB port and remote management through wireless networks, relying on the mobile application for progress monitoring without binding the user to exclusive cloud infrastructure dependencies.

The differences that matter

  • Price: Photon Mono 4 215 € vs HALOT-MAGE 8K 419 € — Photon Mono 4 wins (+95%)
  • Work area: Photon Mono 4 153.4×87 mm vs HALOT-MAGE 8K 228×128 mm — HALOT-MAGE 8K wins (+119%)

Which one to choose

Choose Photon Mono 4 if…

you value price.

See the Photon Mono 4 sheet →

Choose HALOT-MAGE 8K if…

you value work area.

See the HALOT-MAGE 8K sheet →

MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.