ESAB Rogue EM 140 vs Lincoln Electric CITOLINE i300

Technical comparison · MIG/MAG welding (wire feed)

In brief

Rogue EM 140 and CITOLINE i300 are not direct competitors: very different prices (~3.5×). Rogue EM 140 costs less (~€600) and is the entry-level choice; CITOLINE i300 offers more capability at a higher price (~€2100). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.

Parameter
ESAB Rogue EM 140 Rogue EM 140 ESAB F2 · Intermediate
Identity
Launch year 2023
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F3 — Advanced
Price
Price (€) ~550–650 € ~1800–2400 €
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) 22 × 59 × 38.5 cm 39.5 × 83 × 76 cm
Weight (kg) 13.1 kg 50 kg
Power (W) 15000 W
Voltage (V) 120 V 400 V
Category specs
Welding type MIG/MAG Multi-process
Max wire feed speed (m/min) 11.4 m/min 18 m/min
Max welding current (A) 140 A 300 A
Max wire diameter (mm) 0.9 mm 1.6 mm
Duty cycle (rated current) (%) 30 % 35 %
Synergic control False True
Gasless capable True True
Power source technology Inverter Inverter
Aluminium ready True True
Pulse capable False False
Input voltage 400 V (three-phase)
Supported spool Ø200 mm (~5 kg) Ø300 mm (~15 kg)
Ecosystem
Cloud dependency No No
Software notes Control over all operational functions is managed through an intuitive front-panel interface, featuring large LED displays that provide high readability even under strong lighting conditions. The power source integrates 24 factory-preset synergic programs, which are engineered to greatly simplify the configuration of welding parameters across various materials, including carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, and flux-cored wire. Operators can also easily access the traditional 2T and 4T trigger modes, alongside fully adjustable Run-In and Burnback functions to refine the welding arc. Consistent with most industrial systems in this specific equipment category, absolutely no connection to cloud services or reliance on external software applications is required.

The differences that matter

  • Price: Rogue EM 140 600 € vs CITOLINE i300 2100 € — Rogue EM 140 wins (+250%)
  • Max wire diameter: Rogue EM 140 0.9 mm vs CITOLINE i300 1.6 mm — CITOLINE i300 wins (+78%)
  • Max wire feed speed: Rogue EM 140 11.4 m/min vs CITOLINE i300 18 m/min — CITOLINE i300 wins (+58%)
  • Synergic control: CITOLINE i300 yes, Rogue EM 140 no

Which one to choose

Choose Rogue EM 140 if…

you value price.

See the Rogue EM 140 sheet →

Choose CITOLINE i300 if…

you value max wire diameter, max wire feed speed and synergic control.

See the CITOLINE i300 sheet →

MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.