Atomstack A20 Pro V2 vs Sculpfun S9

Technical comparison · Diode laser (405–460 nm)

In brief

The two machines do not work at the same scale: 20 W optical declared on the Atomstack against 5.5 W on the Sculpfun. The first also suits cutting panels, the second is mainly for engraving, and it costs about €190 less.

Parameter
Identity
Launch year 2024 2021
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price (€) ~300–600 € 259 €
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) — 57 × 60 × 27 cm
Weight (kg) 6 kg 3 kg
Work area (mm) 400 × 365 mm 410 × 415 mm
Power (W) 120 W 30 W
Maximum speed 400 mm/s —
Declared precision 0.02 mm 0.01 mm
Category specs
Work area (short side) (mm) 365 mm 410 mm
Rated power (W) 20 W 5.5 W
Source technology Diode Diode
Max travel speed (mm/s) 400 mm/s —
Max processing speed (mm/s) 400 mm/s —
Max cut depth per material — Wood: 15mm, Acrylic: 10mm
Wavelength (nm) 455 nm 450 nm
Min resolution (µm) — 10 µm
Autofocus No No
Rotary included/compatible No No
Passthrough No —
Supported software Proprietary, LightBurn, Other LightBurn, Other
Frame Open, optional enclosure —
Air assist Optional Optional
Fume extraction Optional filter —
Ecosystem
Cloud dependency No No
Software notes The software compatibility of the device is extensive and aligns with the industrial standards of the maker sector. It natively supports both LaserGRBL, a free and open-source option suitable for basic engraving operations, and LightBurn, the most popular paid professional platform for advanced management of layers, cutting parameters, and complex vector formats. Control can be managed directly via a wired USB connection from a computer or in offline mode, using memory cards to load processing files. The machine responds to standard G-code commands, allowing experienced users fine customization of acceleration and speed parameters through the configuration of the internal firmware, without constraints linked to proprietary and closed-source cloud ecosystems. Fully compatible with LightBurn and LaserGRBL (Windows only), operating via standard GRBL firmware without proprietary restrictions.

The differences that matter

  • 20 W against 5.5 W optical power (values declared by the manufacturer) → on cuts the Atomstack needs fewer passes; with the Sculpfun it is better to stay on engraving and thin materials.
  • About €450 against €259 → the Sculpfun costs about €190 less.
  • Work area 400 × 365 mm against 410 × 415 mm → 50 mm more on one side for the Sculpfun, useful for deeper panels.
  • Both work with LightBurn; the Atomstack also reads files from a memory card and has proprietary software → you can work without a computer attached.

Which one to choose

Choose A20 Pro V2 if…

you cut shapes in plywood or acrylic and engrave in batches, and you want to work without a computer attached by loading files from a memory card. You accept a higher price and a shorter bed on the Y axis.

See the A20 Pro V2 sheet →

Choose S9 if…

you engrave wood, leather or tags on a large bed and want to enter diode lasers on a tight budget. The trade-off is power: at 5.5 W a cut takes more passes, and on thick materials the machine reaches its limit sooner.

See the S9 sheet →

Where to buy

Paid link: the price for you does not change. Methodology
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: the purchase links are the same as on the two product sheets and don't influence the verdict. The sheets have the complete data.