Lithoz CeraFab System S25 vs Lithoz CeraFab System S65
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraFab System S65 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S65
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 105 × 178 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 64 × 40 mm | 102 × 64 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 320 mm |
| Declared precision | 25 um | 40 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. | The Lithoz management software is integrated into a proprietary workflow optimized for the ceramic photopolymerization process, essential for precise control of UV exposure. It is not compatible with open-source firmware or slicers such as Cura or PrusaSlicer, as the system requires specific slice parameters for the loading density of the ceramic material and the polymerization behavior of the loaded resin. Support management and file preparation are optimized to prevent warping during the subsequent debinding and sintering phase in the oven. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm vs CeraFab System S65 102×64 mm — CeraFab System S65 wins (+155%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.