The WASP 3MT LDM is positioned in the industrial segment for large-format 3D printing, intended for architecture firms, R&D laboratories, and the ceramics industry requiring an effective print volume of 1 cubic meter. Unlike cheaper hobby or semi-professional machines, it offers solid delta kinematics, brushless motors with closed-loop feedback, and a continuous feed system (CFS) specifically for high-viscosity materials and fibers, ensuring geometric precision that justifies the investment. Compared to custom artisanal solutions or much more expensive anthropomorphic robots, the 3MT LDM offers an integrated, CE-certified environment, drastically reducing setup times and operational risks in professional settings.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products.
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Machine dimensions | 235 × 215 × 305 cm (92.5 × 84.6 × 120.1 in) | manufacturer website |
| Weight | 350.0 kg (771.6 lb) | manufacturer website |
| Power supply | 220 V / 50 Hz / 1470 W | manufacturer website |
| Work area | 1000 × 1000 × 1000 mm (39.4 × 39.4 × 39.4 in) | manufacturer website |
| Maximum speed | 200 mm/s | manufacturer website |
Material compatibilities will be available in a future version.
The machine uses Simplify3D as its reference slicer, provided under license, capable of managing the peculiarities of trajectories for fluid-dense materials. The firmware supports the integration of remote monitoring systems via OctoPrint and standard protocols for managing G-code, ensuring compatibility with other common slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, provided the user knows how to correctly configure the flow and retraction times of the ceramic or cementitious material.
Reviews from those who use this machine every day will be available in the next version of the platform.
Technical data verified on the manufacturer's official website (recording date shown above). Editorial notes, market positioning and anomaly flags are assisted by the MakerSpecs AI system as a second reader, always validated by the author before publication. Read the full methodology →
