Lithoz CeraFab System S320 vs Wasp Delta WASP 2040 Clay
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
Delta WASP 2040 Clay is the cheapest in its class. Delta WASP 2040 Clay leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S320 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab System S320
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
Delta WASP 2040 Clay
Wasp
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2025 | — |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | — | 3300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 105 × 178 cm | 49 × 44 × 87 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 40 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 246 × 130 mm | 200 × 200 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 400 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 180 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 220 V |
| Maximum speed | — | 150 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 60 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software for file preparation and print process management. The firmware is integrated and optimized exclusively for LCM technology, ensuring precise control of light exposure parameters. It is not compatible with standard open-source slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer, requiring the use of a dedicated suite for support management and thermal shrinkage compensation. | The firmware is based on open architecture, ensuring compatibility with major slicers such as Ultimaker Cura and Slic3r. The official ecosystem is optimized for Simplify3D, which allows granular control over retraction and ceramic printing parameters. Users also have access to the WASP application, designed for parametric generation of complex geometric shapes specifically for clay processing. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab System S320 246×130 mm vs Delta WASP 2040 Clay 200×200 mm — Delta WASP 2040 Clay wins (+25%)
Which one to choose
Choose Delta WASP 2040 Clay if…
you value work area. It is the cheapest in its class.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.