Lithoz CeraFab Lab L30 vs Lithoz CeraFab System S25
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraFab Lab L30 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab Lab L30
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2022 | — |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55 × 75 × 160 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 76 × 43 mm | 64 × 40 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 320 mm |
| Declared precision | 40 um | 25 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software, optimized for managing light exposure parameters specific to photosensitive ceramic suspensions. The workflow is not based on open protocols such as GRBL, but is integrated to ensure the control of the photopolymerization process necessary for the structural integrity of the ceramic piece during the subsequent debinding and sintering phase. | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab Lab L30 76×43 mm vs CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm — CeraFab Lab L30 wins (+28%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.