MK4S vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
MK4S leads on the measurable specs (starting with work area), while 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer shows no advantage of its own. Choose MK4S, unless non-technical factors (availability, support, ecosystem) tip the balance.
| Parameter |
MK4S
Prusa Research
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2025 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 999 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 50 × 55 × 40 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 250 × 210 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 220 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 500 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | — | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | — | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | Cartesian | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | — | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | — | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | — | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | False | False |
| Filament sensor | — | True |
| Auto bed leveling | — | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | — | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | — | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | True |
| Max colors | — | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | PrusaSlicer (optimized) and Prusa Connect for remote control. The machine accepts G-code from any slicer (Cura, Simplify3D) and communicates via USB, Ethernet or Wi-Fi using an open Marlin-based protocol. Compatible with OctoPrint and offline management. Does not require a Prusa account to print, unlike machines with proprietary firmware that block features without connection. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: MK4S 250×210 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — MK4S wins (+105%)
- Price: MK4S 999 € vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1200 € — MK4S wins (+20%)
- Multicolor printing: MK4S yes, 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer if…
it shows no measurable advantage over MK4S on the available specs: consider it on price or availability.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.