Prusa Research CORE One+ vs Qidi Tech X-Max 3 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
CORE One+ and X-Max 3 3D Printer are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose CORE One+ if max colors matters more; choose X-Max 3 3D Printer if work area matters more. On the category's overall technical index, X-Max 3 3D Printer scores 56/100 against 45/100 for CORE One+.
| Parameter |
CORE One+
Prusa Research
F2 · Intermediate
|
X-Max 3 3D Printer
Qidi Tech
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1049–1349 € | ~799–999 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 41.5 × 44.4 × 55.5 cm | 55.3 × 55.3 × 60.1 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 22.5 kg | 30.2 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 250 × 220 mm | 325 × 325 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 270 mm | 315 mm |
| Power (W) | 240 W | — |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | — |
| Maximum speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 220 mm | 325 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 270 mm | 315 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | CoreXY |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 290 °C | 350 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 120 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | — | 600 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | True |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | False | True |
| Input shaper | True | True |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | — |
| Max colors | 5 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | Natively compatible with PrusaSlicer (based on Slic3r, open-source), but it works with any slicer able to generate Marlin-flavored G-code, such as Cura, ideaMaker or Simplify3D. The firmware is a Prusa-modified Marlin 2, fully open: no lock-in to proprietary software or protocols. The user has full control over the machine, but PrusaSlicer is recommended for optimal performance, as it includes exclusive profiles and features like dynamic flow calibration. | The system relies on an architecture based on native Klipper firmware, a configuration that guarantees advanced kinematics management and precise control of accelerations through input shaping algorithms. The local and remote user interface is managed fluidly, allowing full monitoring of print parameters without the need to depend on mandatory external cloud services. For file preparation, the machine supports the main slicing software available on the market, including Qidi Print, OrcaSlicer, and PrusaSlicer, offering optimized profiles to enhance production times and the surface quality of components. Connectivity options include wired network and Wi-Fi, facilitating the integration of the device into local networks of laboratories or digital workshops. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CORE One+ 250×220 mm vs X-Max 3 3D Printer 325×325 mm — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+92%)
- Max colors: CORE One+ 5 vs X-Max 3 3D Printer 1 — CORE One+ wins (+400%)
- Price: CORE One+ 1199 € vs X-Max 3 3D Printer 899 € — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+33%)
- Native Klipper: X-Max 3 3D Printer yes, CORE One+ no
- Multicolor printing: CORE One+ yes, X-Max 3 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose X-Max 3 3D Printer if…
you value work area, price and native klipper.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.