Lithoz CeraFab System S65 vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraMax Vario V900 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S65 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab System S65
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 105 × 178 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 102 × 64 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 290 mm |
| Maximum speed | — | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 40 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The Lithoz management software is integrated into a proprietary workflow optimized for the ceramic photopolymerization process, essential for precise control of UV exposure. It is not compatible with open-source firmware or slicers such as Cura or PrusaSlicer, as the system requires specific slice parameters for the loading density of the ceramic material and the polymerization behavior of the loaded resin. Support management and file preparation are optimized to prevent warping during the subsequent debinding and sintering phase in the oven. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab System S65 102×64 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — CeraMax Vario V900 wins (+857%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.