Lithoz CeraFab System S320 vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraMax Vario V900 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S320 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab System S320
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2025 | — |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 105 × 178 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 246 × 130 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 290 mm |
| Maximum speed | — | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 60 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software for file preparation and print process management. The firmware is integrated and optimized exclusively for LCM technology, ensuring precise control of light exposure parameters. It is not compatible with standard open-source slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer, requiring the use of a dedicated suite for support management and thermal shrinkage compensation. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab System S320 246×130 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — CeraMax Vario V900 wins (+95%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.