Lithoz CeraFab System S25 vs Wasp WASP 40100 LDM
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
WASP 40100 LDM leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
WASP 40100 LDM
Wasp
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | — | 8590 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 105 × 178 cm | 85 × 77 × 195 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 84 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 64 × 40 mm | 400 × 400 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 1000 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 200 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 240 V |
| Maximum speed | — | 150 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 25 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. | The machine uses Simplify3D as its official, licensed slicer, whose workflow is optimized to handle the specific parameters of fluid-dense materials via the screw extruder. The system supports remote management via the network and monitoring via a TFT touchscreen interface, with control logic that allows for the configuration of variable retractions and flows, critical when working with ceramics, porcelain, or geopolymers. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm vs WASP 40100 LDM 400×400 mm — WASP 40100 LDM wins (+6150%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.