Lithoz CeraFab Lab L30 vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraMax Vario V900 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab Lab L30 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab Lab L30
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2022 | — |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55 × 75 × 160 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 76 × 43 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 290 mm |
| Maximum speed | — | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 40 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software, optimized for managing light exposure parameters specific to photosensitive ceramic suspensions. The workflow is not based on open protocols such as GRBL, but is integrated to ensure the control of the photopolymerization process necessary for the structural integrity of the ceramic piece during the subsequent debinding and sintering phase. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab Lab L30 76×43 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — CeraMax Vario V900 wins (+1812%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.