Lithoz CeraFab Multi 2M30 vs Lithoz CeraFab System S25
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraFab Multi 2M30 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab Multi 2M30
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 180 × 178 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 76 × 43 mm | 64 × 40 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 320 mm |
| Declared precision | 35 um | 25 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software to control polymerization parameters and manage the multi-material process, essential for layer synchronization. The interface is designed for integration with industrial workflows and does not support consumer slicer ecosystems like Cura or PrusaSlicer, requiring specific training on the manufacturer's production protocols. | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab Multi 2M30 76×43 mm vs CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm — CeraFab Multi 2M30 wins (+28%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.