ESAB Rogue EM 210 PRO vs Lincoln Electric CITOLINE i300
Technical comparison · MIG/MAG welding (wire feed)
Rogue EM 210 PRO and CITOLINE i300 are two mig/mag welding (wire feed) in a similar class. Choose Rogue EM 210 PRO if price matters more; choose CITOLINE i300 if max wire diameter matters more. On the category's overall technical index, CITOLINE i300 scores 88/100 against 76/100 for Rogue EM 210 PRO.
| Parameter |
Rogue EM 210 PRO
ESAB
F2 · Intermediate
|
CITOLINE i300
Lincoln Electric
F3 · Advanced
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1200–1600 € | ~1800–2400 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 22.9 × 54.8 × 40.6 cm | 39.5 × 83 × 76 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 16.9 kg | 50 kg |
| Power (W) | — | 15000 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 400 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Welding type | MIG/MAG | Multi-process |
| Max wire feed speed (m/min) | 16.5 m/min | 18 m/min |
| Max welding current (A) | 210 A | 300 A |
| Max wire diameter (mm) | 1.2 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Duty cycle (rated current) (%) | 25 % | 35 % |
| Synergic control | True | True |
| Gasless capable | True | True |
| Power source technology | Inverter | Inverter |
| Aluminium ready | True | True |
| Pulse capable | False | False |
| Input voltage | Dual voltage | 400 V (three-phase) |
| Supported spool | Ø200 mm (~5 kg) | Ø300 mm (~15 kg) |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The user interface is centered around a bright and intuitive 5-inch TFT screen, allowing easy access to all welding parameters. The system features built-in synergic weld programs, enabling quick and precise arc adjustments via a single control knob. Ten memory slots are available to save and recall frequently used jobs, significantly streamlining setup times. The machine also offers arc dynamics control to fine-tune the response between a soft or crisp arc depending on the material, and it can automatically detect a connected spool gun to further simplify the transition to aluminum welding operations. The interface supports multiple languages and includes automated functions like run-in and burn-back adjustments, providing users with industrial-level control in a compact package. | Control over all operational functions is managed through an intuitive front-panel interface, featuring large LED displays that provide high readability even under strong lighting conditions. The power source integrates 24 factory-preset synergic programs, which are engineered to greatly simplify the configuration of welding parameters across various materials, including carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, and flux-cored wire. Operators can also easily access the traditional 2T and 4T trigger modes, alongside fully adjustable Run-In and Burnback functions to refine the welding arc. Consistent with most industrial systems in this specific equipment category, absolutely no connection to cloud services or reliance on external software applications is required. |
The differences that matter
- Price: Rogue EM 210 PRO 1400 € vs CITOLINE i300 2100 € — Rogue EM 210 PRO wins (+50%)
- Max wire diameter: Rogue EM 210 PRO 1.2 mm vs CITOLINE i300 1.6 mm — CITOLINE i300 wins (+33%)
- Max wire feed speed: Rogue EM 210 PRO 16.5 m/min vs CITOLINE i300 18 m/min — CITOLINE i300 wins (+9%)
Which one to choose
Choose CITOLINE i300 if…
you value max wire diameter and max wire feed speed.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.