H2D vs i-Fast

Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)

In brief

H2D and i-Fast are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose H2D if max print speed matters more; choose i-Fast if multicolor requires accessory matters more. On the category's overall technical index, H2D scores 63/100 against 45/100 for i-Fast.

Parameter
Bambu Lab H2D H2D Bambu Lab F3 · Advanced
Qidi Tech i-Fast i-Fast Qidi Tech F3 · Advanced
Identity
Launch year 2025 2021
Use tier F3 — Advanced F3 — Advanced
Price
Price (€) 1899 € ~1800–2500 €
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) 49.2 × 51.4 × 62.6 cm 71 × 51 × 67 cm
Weight (kg) 31 kg 33 kg
Work area (mm) 350 × 320 mm 330 × 250 mm
Z-axis height (mm) 325 mm 320 mm
Power (W) 2200 W
Maximum speed 1000 mm/s 150 mm/s
Declared precision 50 μm
Category specs
Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) 492 mm 250 mm
Build height Z (mm) 325 mm 320 mm
Kinematics CoreXY CoreXY
Max nozzle temperature (°C) 350 °C 300 °C
Max bed temperature (°C) 120 °C 100 °C
Max print speed (mm/s) 600 mm/s 150 mm/s
Enclosed chamber True True
Filament sensor True True
Auto bed leveling Mesh
Standard nozzle diameter (mm) 0.4 mm 0.4 mm
Multi-extruder True True
Native Klipper False False
Input shaper True False
Multicolor printing True True
Multicolor requires accessory True False
Max colors 4 2
Ecosystem
Cloud dependency No No
Software notes The H2D uses Bambu Studio as its official slicer, available for macOS and Windows. Third-party slicers that export standard G-code — including PrusaSlicer, SuperSlicer and Cura — are also compatible, though certain advanced proprietary features (such as automatic dual-nozzle offset calibration and Material CodeSync) are only accessible within the Bambu ecosystem. Remote monitoring and control are handled via Bambu Handy; Bambu Suite manages laser engraving and cutting workflows. The machine comes with the proprietary Qidi Print software, a slicer based on proven open-source architectures, specifically optimized for the profiles of the technical materials supported by the printer. Users can still generate G-code using other widely adopted third-party slicers on the market, such as Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer, or Simplify3D, after manual configuration of machine and extruder parameters. Although it lacks native cloud features or advanced remote connectivity for corporate fleet management, it supports direct file transfer via local Wi-Fi or USB drives, ensuring a secure offline workflow for intellectual property protection.

The differences that matter

  • Max print speed: H2D 600 mm/s vs i-Fast 150 mm/s — H2D wins (+300%)
  • Max colors: H2D 4 vs i-Fast 2 — H2D wins (+100%)
  • Work area: H2D 350×320 mm vs i-Fast 330×250 mm — H2D wins (+36%)
  • Input shaper: H2D yes, i-Fast no
  • Multicolor requires accessory: H2D yes, i-Fast no

Which one to choose

Choose H2D if…

you value max print speed, max colors and work area.

See the H2D sheet →

Choose i-Fast if…

it shows no measurable advantage over H2D on the available specs: consider it on price or availability.

See the i-Fast sheet →

MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.