Atomstack Swift Mini Laser Engraver vs Ortur Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W

Technical comparison · Diode laser (405–460 nm)

In brief

Swift Mini Laser Engraver and Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W are two diode laser (405–460 nm) in a similar class. Choose Swift Mini Laser Engraver if price matters more; choose Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W if work area matters more.

Parameter
Identity
Launch year 2025 2021
Use tier F1 — Entry F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price (€) ~120–220 € ~150–240 €
Universal specs
Work area (mm) 135 × 145 mm 390 × 410 mm
Maximum speed 166.67 mm/s 10000 mm/min
Declared precision 0.1 mm
Category specs
Work area (short side) (mm) 135 mm 390 mm
Rated power (W) 3 W 1.6 W
Source technology Diode Diode
Max travel speed (mm/s) 166.67 mm/s 166.67 mm/s
Max processing speed (mm/s) 166.67 mm/s 166.67 mm/s
Wavelength (nm) 445 nm 450 nm
Min resolution (µm) 40 µm
Autofocus False False
Rotary included/compatible False False
Passthrough False True
Supported software Proprietary, LightBurn LightBurn, Other
Ecosystem
Cloud dependency No No
Software notes The device stands out for its excellent software flexibility, tailored for both novices and more experienced users. The proprietary AtomStack Studio app, compatible with mobile devices, integrates AI-based features such as text-to-image generation, making the creative process straightforward. Connectivity is ensured via Wi-Fi, direct hotspot, and USB cable. For those who desire more granular control over processing parameters, the Swift Mini maintains full compatibility with LightBurn, the industry-standard laser engraving software for PC, thus offering a scalable learning curve. This machine offers complete compatibility with the main control software currently available for diode lasers, thanks to the adoption of the 32-bit GRBL standard protocol and firmware. Users can manage engraving operations using established and well-documented programs such as LightBurn (paid software, ideal for advanced workflows and users of all operational levels) and LaserGRBL (free and open-source, perfect for those operating on Windows systems). The connection typically occurs via a standard USB cable, ensuring stable communication between the host computer and the machine's motherboard while executing the generated toolpath. The use of closed proprietary software is not required, thus offering maximum operational flexibility.

The differences that matter

  • Work area: Swift Mini Laser Engraver 135×145 mm vs Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W 390×410 mm — Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W wins (+717%)
  • Price: Swift Mini Laser Engraver 170 € vs Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W 195 € — Swift Mini Laser Engraver wins (+15%)

Which one to choose

Choose Swift Mini Laser Engraver if…

you value price.

See the Swift Mini Laser Engraver sheet →

Choose Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W if…

you value work area.

See the Laser Master 2 S2 1.6W sheet →

MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.