3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 Super vs Lithoz CeraFab System S25
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 Super leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 Super
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~7950–8050 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 66 × 86 × 102 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 23 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 415 × 405 mm | 64 × 40 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 500 mm | 320 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 200 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 25 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine integrates a proprietary web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for locally installed software. The firmware manages real-time control of extrusion parameters directly from the browser, supporting common workflows based on G-code files generated by standard slicers optimized for ceramic deposition profiles. | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 Super 415×405 mm vs CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 Super wins (+6465%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.