3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 Micro vs Lithoz CeraFab System S320
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 Micro leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S320 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 Micro
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S320
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2025 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~3499–3599 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 53.34 × 76.2 × 71.12 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 17 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 335 × 320 mm | 246 × 130 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 305 mm | 320 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 130 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 60 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The firmware natively manages the protocol via an integrated web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for dedicated applications. The machine is compatible with the main standard slicers on the market, which generate the G-code needed to control the piston extrusion system via standard printer commands. | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software for file preparation and print process management. The firmware is integrated and optimized exclusively for LCM technology, ensuring precise control of light exposure parameters. It is not compatible with standard open-source slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer, requiring the use of a dedicated suite for support management and thermal shrinkage compensation. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 Micro 335×320 mm vs CeraFab System S320 246×130 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 Micro wins (+235%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.