3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 Micro vs Lithoz CeraFab System S25
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 Micro leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab System S25 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 Micro
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab System S25
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~3499–3599 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 53.34 × 76.2 × 71.12 cm | 85 × 105 × 178 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 17 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 335 × 320 mm | 64 × 40 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 305 mm | 320 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 130 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 25 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The firmware natively manages the protocol via an integrated web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for dedicated applications. The machine is compatible with the main standard slicers on the market, which generate the G-code needed to control the piston extrusion system via standard printer commands. | The system uses proprietary slicing software developed by Lithoz, specifically optimized for the rheological and thermal management of photocurable ceramic suspensions. It is not compatible with open-source slicers such as Cura or Slic3r, as the process requires direct control of light exposure parameters and peel plane kinematics for each layer of the component. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 Micro 335×320 mm vs CeraFab System S25 64×40 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 Micro wins (+4088%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.