3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 Micro vs Lithoz CeraFab Lab L30
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 Micro leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab Lab L30 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 Micro
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraFab Lab L30
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2022 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~3499–3599 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 53.34 × 76.2 × 71.12 cm | 55 × 75 × 160 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 17 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 335 × 320 mm | 76 × 43 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 305 mm | 170 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 130 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 40 um |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The firmware natively manages the protocol via an integrated web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for dedicated applications. The machine is compatible with the main standard slicers on the market, which generate the G-code needed to control the piston extrusion system via standard printer commands. | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software, optimized for managing light exposure parameters specific to photosensitive ceramic suspensions. The workflow is not based on open protocols such as GRBL, but is integrated to ensure the control of the photopolymerization process necessary for the structural integrity of the ceramic piece during the subsequent debinding and sintering phase. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 Micro 335×320 mm vs CeraFab Lab L30 76×43 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 Micro wins (+3180%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.