Qidi Tech X-Smart 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Smart 3 and 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 are not direct competitors: very different prices (~3.1×). X-Smart 3 costs less (~€400) and is the entry-level choice; 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 offers more capability at a higher price (~€1250). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
X-Smart 3
Qidi Tech
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~350–450 € | ~1000–1500 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 37 × 36.2 × 39.7 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 10.5 kg | 14.2 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 175 × 180 mm | 230 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 235 mm |
| Power (W) | 350 W | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 500 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | 0.1 mm | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 175 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 170 mm | 235 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 100 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 500 mm/s | — |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | — |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | False | True |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The QIDI X-Smart 3 is primarily managed via QIDI Slicer, a proprietary software based on the latest versions of PrusaSlicer, optimized to fully leverage the machine's high speeds and CoreXY structure. The interface offers both a beginner mode and an advanced mode for granular control of parameters. The printer comes with pre-installed Klipper firmware, allowing advanced users direct access to the Fluidd web interface for real-time monitoring, calibration, and macro customization. Nevertheless, compatibility is guaranteed with the most popular third-party slicing software, including Ultimaker Cura, Simplify3D, and standard PrusaSlicer, ensuring a flexible and adaptable workflow. | The machine is natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a free, cross-platform software (Windows, macOS, Linux) custom-built to handle the three workflows (3D printing, laser engraving, CNC carving) within a single interface. Luban simplifies the transition between tasks and is ideal for novice users. However, the controller, running on a custom firmware, supports the export and use of standard G-code files. Users can utilize third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer for 3D printing, LightBurn for laser module control, and Fusion 360 or Vectric Aspire for CNC operations, providing the necessary flexibility for more advanced workflows. |
The differences that matter
- Price: X-Smart 3 400 € vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 1250 € — X-Smart 3 wins (+212%)
- Work area: X-Smart 3 175×180 mm vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 230×250 mm — 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 wins (+83%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Smart 3 yes, 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 no
- Build height Z: X-Smart 3 170 mm vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 235 mm — 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 wins (+38%)
- Native Klipper: X-Smart 3 yes, 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 no
Which one to choose
Choose X-Smart 3 if…
you value price, enclosed chamber and native klipper.
Choose 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 if…
you value work area and build height z.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.