Qidi Tech X-Smart 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Smart 3 and 2.0 A350 are not direct competitors: very different prices (~4.1×). X-Smart 3 costs less (~€400) and is the entry-level choice; 2.0 A350 offers more capability at a higher price (~€1650). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
X-Smart 3
Qidi Tech
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A350
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~350–450 € | ~1500–1800 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 37 × 36.2 × 39.7 cm | 49.5 × 50.6 × 58 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 10.5 kg | 21.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 175 × 180 mm | 320 × 350 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 330 mm |
| Power (W) | 350 W | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 500 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 0.1 mm | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 175 mm | 320 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 170 mm | 330 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 80 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 500 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | False | False |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The QIDI X-Smart 3 is primarily managed via QIDI Slicer, a proprietary software based on the latest versions of PrusaSlicer, optimized to fully leverage the machine's high speeds and CoreXY structure. The interface offers both a beginner mode and an advanced mode for granular control of parameters. The printer comes with pre-installed Klipper firmware, allowing advanced users direct access to the Fluidd web interface for real-time monitoring, calibration, and macro customization. Nevertheless, compatibility is guaranteed with the most popular third-party slicing software, including Ultimaker Cura, Simplify3D, and standard PrusaSlicer, ensuring a flexible and adaptable workflow. | The proprietary Snapmaker Luban software is designed to manage all three main functions of the machine (3D printing, laser processing, and CNC routing) within a single interface, significantly simplifying the workflow for users approaching mixed manufacturing. For pure 3D printing, the control board still accepts standard G-code generated by third-party slicers such as Ultimaker Cura or PrusaSlicer, providing advanced users with greater control over specific extrusion and movement settings. |
The differences that matter
- Price: X-Smart 3 400 € vs 2.0 A350 1650 € — X-Smart 3 wins (+312%)
- Work area: X-Smart 3 175×180 mm vs 2.0 A350 320×350 mm — 2.0 A350 wins (+256%)
- Max print speed: X-Smart 3 500 mm/s vs 2.0 A350 100 mm/s — X-Smart 3 wins (+400%)
- Build height Z: X-Smart 3 170 mm vs 2.0 A350 330 mm — 2.0 A350 wins (+94%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Smart 3 yes, 2.0 A350 no
Which one to choose
Choose X-Smart 3 if…
you value price, max print speed and enclosed chamber.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.