Qidi Tech X-Plus 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350T 3-in-1
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Plus 3 and 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose X-Plus 3 if max print speed and price matters more; choose 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 if work area matters more. On the category's overall technical index, X-Plus 3 scores 55/100 against 16/100 for 2.0 A350T 3-in-1.
| Parameter |
X-Plus 3
Qidi Tech
F3 · Advanced
|
2.0 A350T 3-in-1
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2022 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 799 € | ~1400–1600 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 51.1 × 52.7 × 52.9 cm | 49.5 × 50.6 × 58 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 24.3 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 280 × 280 mm | 320 × 350 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 270 mm | 330 mm |
| Power (W) | 800 W | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 230 V |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 280 mm | 320 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 270 mm | 330 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 350 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 80 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The X-Plus 3 is natively supported by QIDI Print, the company's official slicer based on PrusaSlicer, which offers pre-configured and optimized profiles for supported materials, ensuring a ready-to-use experience. The software's user interface is designed to simplify the print preparation process, from support generation to advanced cooling configuration. Because the printer uses Klipper-based firmware, advanced users can interact directly via the integrated web interface (Fluidd or Mainsail), allowing for in-depth monitoring and fine-tuning of print parameters in real time. The system is also fully compatible with third-party software such as Ultimaker Cura, Simplify3D, standard PrusaSlicer, and OrcaSlicer, offering maximum flexibility in workflows. | The machine is primarily managed via Snapmaker Luban, a free proprietary software integrating file preparation for 3D printing, laser engraving, and CNC milling into a single environment. While intuitive for beginners, experienced users may find limitations in advanced settings. However, the system accepts G-code files generated by third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer for 3D printing, and software like LightBurn or Fusion 360 for laser and CNC work, ensuring excellent operational versatility. |
The differences that matter
- Max print speed: X-Plus 3 600 mm/s vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 100 mm/s — X-Plus 3 wins (+500%)
- Price: X-Plus 3 799 € vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 1500 € — X-Plus 3 wins (+88%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Plus 3 yes, 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 no
- Work area: X-Plus 3 280×280 mm vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 320×350 mm — 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 wins (+43%)
- Max nozzle temperature: X-Plus 3 350 °C vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 275 °C — X-Plus 3 wins (+27%)
Which one to choose
Choose 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 if…
you value work area and build height z.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.