Qidi Tech X-Plus 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Plus 3 leads on the available specs (starting with price); 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case. On the category's overall technical index, X-Plus 3 scores 55/100 against 16/100 for 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1.
| Parameter |
X-Plus 3
Qidi Tech
F3 · Advanced
|
2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 799 € | ~1000–1500 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 51.1 × 52.7 × 52.9 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 24.3 kg | 14.2 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 280 × 280 mm | 230 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 270 mm | 235 mm |
| Power (W) | 800 W | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 280 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 270 mm | 235 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 350 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 100 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | — |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | — |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | — | True |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The X-Plus 3 is natively supported by QIDI Print, the company's official slicer based on PrusaSlicer, which offers pre-configured and optimized profiles for supported materials, ensuring a ready-to-use experience. The software's user interface is designed to simplify the print preparation process, from support generation to advanced cooling configuration. Because the printer uses Klipper-based firmware, advanced users can interact directly via the integrated web interface (Fluidd or Mainsail), allowing for in-depth monitoring and fine-tuning of print parameters in real time. The system is also fully compatible with third-party software such as Ultimaker Cura, Simplify3D, standard PrusaSlicer, and OrcaSlicer, offering maximum flexibility in workflows. | The machine is natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a free, cross-platform software (Windows, macOS, Linux) custom-built to handle the three workflows (3D printing, laser engraving, CNC carving) within a single interface. Luban simplifies the transition between tasks and is ideal for novice users. However, the controller, running on a custom firmware, supports the export and use of standard G-code files. Users can utilize third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer for 3D printing, LightBurn for laser module control, and Fusion 360 or Vectric Aspire for CNC operations, providing the necessary flexibility for more advanced workflows. |
The differences that matter
- Price: X-Plus 3 799 € vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 1250 € — X-Plus 3 wins (+56%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Plus 3 yes, 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 no
- Work area: X-Plus 3 280×280 mm vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 230×250 mm — X-Plus 3 wins (+36%)
- Max nozzle temperature: X-Plus 3 350 °C vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 275 °C — X-Plus 3 wins (+27%)
- Native Klipper: X-Plus 3 yes, 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 no
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.