Qidi Tech X-Plus 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Plus 3 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case. On the category's overall technical index, X-Plus 3 scores 55/100 against 13/100 for 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
X-Plus 3
Qidi Tech
F3 · Advanced
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 799 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 51.1 × 52.7 × 52.9 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 24.3 kg | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 280 × 280 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 270 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | 800 W | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 280 mm | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 270 mm | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 350 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | — | True |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The X-Plus 3 is natively supported by QIDI Print, the company's official slicer based on PrusaSlicer, which offers pre-configured and optimized profiles for supported materials, ensuring a ready-to-use experience. The software's user interface is designed to simplify the print preparation process, from support generation to advanced cooling configuration. Because the printer uses Klipper-based firmware, advanced users can interact directly via the integrated web interface (Fluidd or Mainsail), allowing for in-depth monitoring and fine-tuning of print parameters in real time. The system is also fully compatible with third-party software such as Ultimaker Cura, Simplify3D, standard PrusaSlicer, and OrcaSlicer, offering maximum flexibility in workflows. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: X-Plus 3 280×280 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — X-Plus 3 wins (+206%)
- Max print speed: X-Plus 3 600 mm/s vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — X-Plus 3 wins (+500%)
- Build height Z: X-Plus 3 270 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 145 mm — X-Plus 3 wins (+86%)
- Price: X-Plus 3 799 € vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1200 € — X-Plus 3 wins (+50%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Plus 3 yes, 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose X-Plus 3 if…
you value work area, max print speed and build height z.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.