Qidi Tech X-Max 3 3D Printer vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350T 3-in-1
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Max 3 3D Printer and 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose X-Max 3 3D Printer if max print speed and price matters more; choose 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 if work area and build height z matters more. On the category's overall technical index, X-Max 3 3D Printer scores 56/100 against 16/100 for 2.0 A350T 3-in-1.
| Parameter |
X-Max 3 3D Printer
Qidi Tech
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A350T 3-in-1
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2022 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~799–999 € | ~1400–1600 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55.3 × 55.3 × 60.1 cm | 49.5 × 50.6 × 58 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 30.2 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 325 × 325 mm | 320 × 350 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 315 mm | 330 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 230 V |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 325 mm | 320 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 315 mm | 330 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 350 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 80 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system relies on an architecture based on native Klipper firmware, a configuration that guarantees advanced kinematics management and precise control of accelerations through input shaping algorithms. The local and remote user interface is managed fluidly, allowing full monitoring of print parameters without the need to depend on mandatory external cloud services. For file preparation, the machine supports the main slicing software available on the market, including Qidi Print, OrcaSlicer, and PrusaSlicer, offering optimized profiles to enhance production times and the surface quality of components. Connectivity options include wired network and Wi-Fi, facilitating the integration of the device into local networks of laboratories or digital workshops. | The machine is primarily managed via Snapmaker Luban, a free proprietary software integrating file preparation for 3D printing, laser engraving, and CNC milling into a single environment. While intuitive for beginners, experienced users may find limitations in advanced settings. However, the system accepts G-code files generated by third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer for 3D printing, and software like LightBurn or Fusion 360 for laser and CNC work, ensuring excellent operational versatility. |
The differences that matter
- Max print speed: X-Max 3 3D Printer 600 mm/s vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 100 mm/s — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+500%)
- Price: X-Max 3 3D Printer 899 € vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 1500 € — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+67%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Max 3 3D Printer yes, 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 no
- Max nozzle temperature: X-Max 3 3D Printer 350 °C vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 275 °C — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+27%)
- Max bed temperature: X-Max 3 3D Printer 120 °C vs 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 80 °C — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+50%)
Which one to choose
Choose X-Max 3 3D Printer if…
you value max print speed, price and enclosed chamber.
Choose 2.0 A350T 3-in-1 if…
you value work area and build height z.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.