X-Max 3 3D Printer vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X-Max 3 3D Printer leads on the measurable specs (starting with work area), while 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer shows no advantage of its own. Choose X-Max 3 3D Printer, unless non-technical factors (availability, support, ecosystem) tip the balance. On the category's overall technical index, X-Max 3 3D Printer scores 56/100 against 13/100 for 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
X-Max 3 3D Printer
Qidi Tech
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2023 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~799–999 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55.3 × 55.3 × 60.1 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 30.2 kg | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 325 × 325 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 315 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 325 mm | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 315 mm | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 350 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | False | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | — | True |
| Max colors | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system relies on an architecture based on native Klipper firmware, a configuration that guarantees advanced kinematics management and precise control of accelerations through input shaping algorithms. The local and remote user interface is managed fluidly, allowing full monitoring of print parameters without the need to depend on mandatory external cloud services. For file preparation, the machine supports the main slicing software available on the market, including Qidi Print, OrcaSlicer, and PrusaSlicer, offering optimized profiles to enhance production times and the surface quality of components. Connectivity options include wired network and Wi-Fi, facilitating the integration of the device into local networks of laboratories or digital workshops. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: X-Max 3 3D Printer 325×325 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+313%)
- Max print speed: X-Max 3 3D Printer 600 mm/s vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+500%)
- Build height Z: X-Max 3 3D Printer 315 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 145 mm — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+117%)
- Enclosed chamber: X-Max 3 3D Printer yes, 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer no
- Price: X-Max 3 3D Printer 899 € vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1200 € — X-Max 3 3D Printer wins (+33%)
Which one to choose
Choose X-Max 3 3D Printer if…
you value work area, max print speed and build height z.
Choose 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer if…
it shows no measurable advantage over X-Max 3 3D Printer on the available specs: consider it on price or availability.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.