Max4 3D Printer vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
Max4 3D Printer and 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer are not direct competitors: different use classes (F4 vs F2). Max4 3D Printer costs less (~€1049) and is the entry-level choice; 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer offers more capability at a higher price (~€1200). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
Max4 3D Printer
Qidi Tech
F4 · Semi-professional
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 1049 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55.8 × 57.8 × 61.2 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 40 kg | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 390 × 390 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 340 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 800 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 390 mm | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 340 mm | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 370 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 800 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | — | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | True |
| Max colors | 16 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine natively runs on Klipper firmware, offering comprehensive control and high computational speed for advanced features like input shaping. The user interface is managed locally via a large 5-inch touchscreen. Remote monitoring is facilitated by the integrated 1080p AI webcam with error detection for extrusion failures. For slicing, the manufacturer provides QIDI Studio, a software derived from PrusaSlicer/Bambu Studio, specifically optimized for high-temperature material profiles. Users can also access the Fluidd web interface for advanced control over the printer parameters and print offline via a USB drive or through the local network. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: Max4 3D Printer 390×390 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — Max4 3D Printer wins (+494%)
- Max print speed: Max4 3D Printer 800 mm/s vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — Max4 3D Printer wins (+700%)
- Build height Z: Max4 3D Printer 340 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 145 mm — Max4 3D Printer wins (+134%)
- Max colors: Max4 3D Printer 16 vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1 — Max4 3D Printer wins (+1500%)
- Enclosed chamber: Max4 3D Printer yes, 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose Max4 3D Printer if…
you value work area, max print speed and build height z.
Choose 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer if…
it shows no measurable advantage over Max4 3D Printer on the available specs: consider it on price or availability.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.