Qidi Tech Max4 3D Printer vs Snapmaker 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
Max4 3D Printer and 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer are not direct competitors: different use classes (F4 vs F2). Max4 3D Printer costs less (~€1049) and is the entry-level choice; 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer offers more capability at a higher price (~€1200). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
Max4 3D Printer
Qidi Tech
F4 · Semi-professional
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 1049 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 55.8 × 57.8 × 61.2 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 40 kg | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 390 × 390 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 340 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 800 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 390 mm | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 340 mm | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 370 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 800 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | — | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | True | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | True |
| Max colors | 16 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine natively runs on Klipper firmware, offering comprehensive control and high computational speed for advanced features like input shaping. The user interface is managed locally via a large 5-inch touchscreen. Remote monitoring is facilitated by the integrated 1080p AI webcam with error detection for extrusion failures. For slicing, the manufacturer provides QIDI Studio, a software derived from PrusaSlicer/Bambu Studio, specifically optimized for high-temperature material profiles. Users can also access the Fluidd web interface for advanced control over the printer parameters and print offline via a USB drive or through the local network. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: Max4 3D Printer 390×390 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — Max4 3D Printer wins (+494%)
- Max print speed: Max4 3D Printer 800 mm/s vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — Max4 3D Printer wins (+700%)
- Build height Z: Max4 3D Printer 340 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 145 mm — Max4 3D Printer wins (+134%)
- Max colors: Max4 3D Printer 16 vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1 — Max4 3D Printer wins (+1500%)
- Enclosed chamber: Max4 3D Printer yes, 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose Max4 3D Printer if…
you value work area, max print speed and build height z.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.