Qidi Tech i-Fast vs Snapmaker 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
i-Fast and 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose i-Fast if enclosed chamber and max colors matters more; choose 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 if price matters more. On the category's overall technical index, i-Fast scores 45/100 against 16/100 for 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1.
| Parameter |
i-Fast
Qidi Tech
F3 · Advanced
|
2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2021 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1800–2500 € | ~1000–1500 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 71 × 51 × 67 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 33 kg | 14.2 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 330 × 250 mm | 230 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 235 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 150 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 250 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 320 mm | 235 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 150 mm/s | — |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | — | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | — |
| Multi-extruder | True | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | False | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | False | True |
| Max colors | 2 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine comes with the proprietary Qidi Print software, a slicer based on proven open-source architectures, specifically optimized for the profiles of the technical materials supported by the printer. Users can still generate G-code using other widely adopted third-party slicers on the market, such as Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer, or Simplify3D, after manual configuration of machine and extruder parameters. Although it lacks native cloud features or advanced remote connectivity for corporate fleet management, it supports direct file transfer via local Wi-Fi or USB drives, ensuring a secure offline workflow for intellectual property protection. | The machine is natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a free, cross-platform software (Windows, macOS, Linux) custom-built to handle the three workflows (3D printing, laser engraving, CNC carving) within a single interface. Luban simplifies the transition between tasks and is ideal for novice users. However, the controller, running on a custom firmware, supports the export and use of standard G-code files. Users can utilize third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer for 3D printing, LightBurn for laser module control, and Fusion 360 or Vectric Aspire for CNC operations, providing the necessary flexibility for more advanced workflows. |
The differences that matter
- Price: i-Fast 2150 € vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 1250 € — 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 wins (+72%)
- Enclosed chamber: i-Fast yes, 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 no
- Max colors: i-Fast 2 vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 1 — i-Fast wins (+100%)
- Work area: i-Fast 330×250 mm vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 230×250 mm — i-Fast wins (+43%)
- Build height Z: i-Fast 320 mm vs 2.0 A250 Modular 3-in-1 235 mm — i-Fast wins (+36%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.