Qidi Tech i-Fast vs Snapmaker 2.0 F250 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
i-Fast and 2.0 F250 3D Printer are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose i-Fast if enclosed chamber and max colors matters more; choose 2.0 F250 3D Printer if price matters more. On the category's overall technical index, i-Fast scores 45/100 against 21/100 for 2.0 F250 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
i-Fast
Qidi Tech
F3 · Advanced
|
2.0 F250 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2021 | 2021 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1800–2500 € | ~900–1200 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 71 × 51 × 67 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 33 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 330 × 250 mm | 230 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 320 mm | 235 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 150 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | — | 0.05 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 250 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 320 mm | 235 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 150 mm/s | — |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | — | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | True | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | False | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | False | False |
| Max colors | 2 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine comes with the proprietary Qidi Print software, a slicer based on proven open-source architectures, specifically optimized for the profiles of the technical materials supported by the printer. Users can still generate G-code using other widely adopted third-party slicers on the market, such as Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer, or Simplify3D, after manual configuration of machine and extruder parameters. Although it lacks native cloud features or advanced remote connectivity for corporate fleet management, it supports direct file transfer via local Wi-Fi or USB drives, ensuring a secure offline workflow for intellectual property protection. | The device utilizes the proprietary Snapmaker Luban software, an integrated environment that intuitively manages file preparation and print process monitoring. Luban offers preset profiles for the most common materials, simplifying the workflow for less experienced operators, while also granting access to advanced parameters for fine-tuning extrusion settings. Alternatively, the machine is fully compatible with popular third-party slicers on the market, such as Ultimaker Cura and PrusaSlicer, provided a custom profile is configured to fully leverage the system's capabilities. |
The differences that matter
- Price: i-Fast 2150 € vs 2.0 F250 3D Printer 1050 € — 2.0 F250 3D Printer wins (+105%)
- Enclosed chamber: i-Fast yes, 2.0 F250 3D Printer no
- Max colors: i-Fast 2 vs 2.0 F250 3D Printer 1 — i-Fast wins (+100%)
- Work area: i-Fast 330×250 mm vs 2.0 F250 3D Printer 230×250 mm — i-Fast wins (+43%)
- Build height Z: i-Fast 320 mm vs 2.0 F250 3D Printer 235 mm — i-Fast wins (+36%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.