Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer vs Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer and Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer if price matters more; choose Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle if closed chamber matters more. On the category's overall technical index, Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle scores 60/100 against 39/100 for Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer
Prusa Research
F2 · Intermediate
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Riconoscimenti | — | |
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 2299 € | 4499 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 70 × 90 × 72 cm | 70 × 90 × 72 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 33.7 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 360 × 360 mm | 360 × 360 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 360 mm | 360 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 720 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 230 V |
| Maximum speed | 400 mm/s | — |
| Declared precision | 0.2 mm | 0.2 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| XY print surface (mm) | 360.0 mm | 360 mm |
| Maximum Z height (mm) | 360.0 mm | 360 mm |
| Kinematics | corexy | corexy |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 290 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 100 °C | 120 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 400 mm/s | — |
| Closed chamber | False | True |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto leveling | mesh | mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | True | True |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | True | True |
| Multicolor printing | True | True |
| Requires external accessory | True | False |
| Maximum colors | 5 | 5 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The printer runs Marlin firmware customized by Prusa, heavily influenced by Klipper and natively compatible with PrusaSlicer for tool-change management, Input Shaper, and Pressure Advance. Other slicers such as Cura or Simplify3D produce standard G-code but don't support tool changing or the segmented bed. The G-code protocol is open, and control via OctoPrint or Pronterface is possible. PrusaConnect and Wi-Fi are built in for remote management, while the absence of a locked proprietary ecosystem allows the use of third-party filaments and spare parts. | The printer is natively compatible with PrusaSlicer, an open-source slicer with official tested profiles for all supported materials; OrcaSlicer profiles are also available. The firmware is Prusa-proprietary (STM32/xBuddy-based) with no native Klipper support. Remote management is available via Prusa Connect (optional cloud platform) or over the local network; offline printing from USB is fully supported with no functional limitations. |
MakerSpecs Awards
Nessun riconoscimento in questa fascia.
Largest work area Advanced
The largest work area among advanced Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM) machines: 1296 cm².
How we assign awards →The differences that matter
- Price: Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer 2299 € vs Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle 4499 € — Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer wins (+96%)
- Closed chamber: Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle yes, Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer no
- Requires external accessory: Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer yes, Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle no
- Max bed temperature: Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer 100 °C vs Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle 120 °C — Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle wins (+20%)
Which one to choose
Choose Original Prusa XL Single-toolhead 3D Printer if…
you value price.
Choose Original Prusa XL 5-toolhead 3D Printer - Enclosure Bundle if…
you value closed chamber and max bed temperature. «A closed chamber reduces thermal gradients around the part being built, limiting warping and cracking caused by rapid cooling in high-shrinkage materials such as ABS, ASA, and PC. It also shields the mechanism from drafts and airborne particles. A closed chamber is effectively necessary for technical materials; for PLA and PETG it is an advantage, not a requirement.»
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.