Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900 vs Wasp WASP 40100 LDM
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
WASP 40100 LDM leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraMax Vario V900 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
WASP 40100 LDM
Wasp
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | — | 8590 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 95 × 185 × 220 cm | 85 × 77 × 195 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 84 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 250 × 250 mm | 400 × 400 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 290 mm | 1000 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 200 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 240 V |
| Maximum speed | 8000 mm/s | 150 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 0.5 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. | The machine uses Simplify3D as its official, licensed slicer, whose workflow is optimized to handle the specific parameters of fluid-dense materials via the screw extruder. The system supports remote management via the network and monitoring via a TFT touchscreen interface, with control logic that allows for the configuration of variable retractions and flows, critical when working with ceramics, porcelain, or geopolymers. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm vs WASP 40100 LDM 400×400 mm — WASP 40100 LDM wins (+156%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.