Lithoz CeraFab Multi 2M30 vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
CeraMax Vario V900 leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraFab Multi 2M30 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
CeraFab Multi 2M30
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 85 × 180 × 178 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Work area (mm) | 76 × 43 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 170 mm | 290 mm |
| Maximum speed | — | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 35 um | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system uses proprietary Lithoz software to control polymerization parameters and manage the multi-material process, essential for layer synchronization. The interface is designed for integration with industrial workflows and does not support consumer slicer ecosystems like Cura or PrusaSlicer, requiring specific training on the manufacturer's production protocols. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: CeraFab Multi 2M30 76×43 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — CeraMax Vario V900 wins (+1812%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.