Elegoo Jupiter 2 vs Elegoo Mars 5 Ultra
Technical comparison · Resin 3D printing
The Jupiter 2 costs €899, the Mars 5 Ultra €249: a 3.6× gap that puts them in different tiers (F3 vs F2), even though both launched in 2024. They don't serve the same use: the former suits large parts, the latter miniatures and fine detail work on a tight budget.
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2024 | 2024 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 899 € | 249 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 49.8 × 35.8 × 75 cm | 26 × 26.8 × 45.15 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 40 kg | 8.8 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 302.4 × 161.98 mm | 153.36 × 77.76 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 300 mm | 165 mm |
| Power (W) | 180 W | 72 W |
| Voltage (V) | 110 V | 100 V |
| Maximum speed | 70 mm/min | 2.5 mm/min |
| Declared precision | 26 μm | 18 μm |
| Category specs | ||
| Build area XY (short side) (mm) | 161.98 mm | 77.76 mm |
| XY resolution (µm) | 26 µm | 18 µm |
| Light source | Mono LCD | Mono LCD |
| Print speed (mm/h) | 70 mm/h | 150 mm/h |
| Tilt / peel system | Film ACF | Tilt |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The system natively supports files generated by the most widespread industrial and commercial slicing applications, such as ChituBox and Voxeldance Tango. Built-in networking features allow for remote monitoring and file transfers via integrated Wi-Fi or a dedicated Ethernet interface, simplifying deployment within connected digital manufacturing pipelines. Firmware updates are regularly released by the manufacturer via downloadable files for USB installation, ensuring continuous optimization of curing algorithms and broad compatibility with newly developed photosensitive polymer resins. | Machine control and management rely on a flexible and modern software ecosystem. The device natively supports leading industry slicing programs, including ChituBox and Voxeldance Tango, ensuring extensive customization of printing parameters. Integrated Wi-Fi connectivity allows for remote monitoring and file transmission via cloud functionalities or cluster management, streamlining the workflow in multi-unit laboratory environments. The proprietary firmware handles real-time error notifications, such as resin shortage or residues in the vat, interfacing directly with the touchscreen display to guide the user through operational troubleshooting independently and safely. |
The differences that matter
- Price: €899 vs €249 — the Jupiter 2 costs 261% more.
- Work area: 302.4×161.98 mm on the Jupiter 2 vs 153.36×77.76 mm on the Mars 5 Ultra (+311%).
- XY resolution: 18 µm on the Mars 5 Ultra vs 26 µm on the Jupiter 2 — the smaller plate concentrates the same resolution over less area.
- Weight: 40 kg on the Jupiter 2 vs 8.8 kg on the Mars 5 Ultra — the Jupiter 2 needs a fixed station, the Mars 5 Ultra is portable.
- Tier: F3 for the Jupiter 2, F2 for the Mars 5 Ultra, despite both launching in 2024.
Which one to choose
Choose Jupiter 2 if…
you need a much larger work area (302.4×161.98 mm vs 153.36×77.76 mm, 311% more) to print big parts or several models together, and your budget goes up to €899.
Choose Mars 5 Ultra if…
your budget is under €300 and the parts you print stay within 153.36×77.76 mm: at €249 you also get finer XY resolution, 18 µm vs the Jupiter 2's 26 µm.
Where to buy
Paid link: the price for you does not change. Methodology
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: the purchase links are the same as on the two product sheets and don't influence the verdict. The sheets have the complete data.