X2D vs Original 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
X2D leads on the measurable specs (starting with work area), while Original 3-in-1 3D Printer shows no advantage of its own. Choose X2D, unless non-technical factors (availability, support, ecosystem) tip the balance. On the category's overall technical index, X2D scores 62/100 against 0/100 for Original 3-in-1 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
X2D
Bambu Lab
F3 · Advanced
|
Original 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | 2017 |
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 629 € | ~400–850 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 39.2 × 40.6 × 47.8 cm | 27.2 × 33.5 × 28.9 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 16.25 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 256 × 256 mm | 125 × 125 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 260 mm | 125 mm |
| Power (W) | 1600 W | — |
| Maximum speed | 1000 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 50 μm | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 256 mm | 125 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 260 mm | 125 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 250 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 80 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 1000 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | True | False |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | — |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | True | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | — |
| Max colors | 25 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The X2D uses Bambu Studio as its official software, available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It also accepts standard G-code from third-party slicers such as PrusaSlicer, SuperSlicer, and Cura, though some advanced features — including automatic calibration and dual-nozzle workflow management — are only fully supported within Bambu Studio. | Natively compatible with Snapmaker Luban, the proprietary software specifically designed to manage the machine's three different functions within a single environment. The printer is based on standard Marlin firmware and supports G-code formats, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or Simplify3D for 3D printing. For CNC and laser operations, it is possible to use external programs such as Autodesk Fusion 360, LaserGRBL, or LightBurn, exporting compatible toolpaths via the interface or USB port. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: X2D 256×256 mm vs Original 3-in-1 3D Printer 125×125 mm — X2D wins (+319%)
- Max print speed: X2D 1000 mm/s vs Original 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — X2D wins (+900%)
- Build height Z: X2D 260 mm vs Original 3-in-1 3D Printer 125 mm — X2D wins (+108%)
- Max colors: X2D 25 vs Original 3-in-1 3D Printer 1 — X2D wins (+2400%)
- Enclosed chamber: X2D yes, Original 3-in-1 3D Printer no
Which one to choose
Choose Original 3-in-1 3D Printer if…
it shows no measurable advantage over X2D on the available specs: consider it on price or availability.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.