Bambu Lab P1P vs Snapmaker 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
P1P and 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer are two fused filament fabrication (fff/fdm) in a similar class. Choose P1P if price and work area matters more; choose 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer if max bed temperature matters more. On the category's overall technical index, P1P scores 36/100 against 13/100 for 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer.
| Parameter |
P1P
Bambu Lab
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2022 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~500–600 € | ~1100–1300 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 38.6 × 38.9 × 45.8 cm | 42.3 × 39.8 × 40.7 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 9.65 kg | 9.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 256 × 256 mm | 160 × 160 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 256 mm | 145 mm |
| Power (W) | 1000 W | 320 W |
| Voltage (V) | 100 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 500 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 256 mm | 160 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 256 mm | 145 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | 300 °C | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 100 °C | 110 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 500 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | False | False |
| Filament sensor | True | True |
| Auto bed leveling | Mesh | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | True | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | True |
| Max colors | 16 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The P1P works with Bambu Studio, Bambu Lab's proprietary slicing software available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, and with the Bambu Handy mobile app for remote monitoring and print management. Cloud connectivity is optional: the printer also supports a LAN-only mode for users who prefer to operate without connecting to external servers. It is not natively compatible with open-source firmware such as Klipper, nor with third-party slicers like PrusaSlicer or OrcaSlicer without unofficial profiles. | Natively managed via Snapmaker Luban, a unified software that prepares files for all three processes (3D printing, laser, CNC). The machine is based on modified Marlin firmware and accepts standard G-code, allowing the use of third-party slicers like Cura or PrusaSlicer solely for 3D printing operations. |
The differences that matter
- Price: P1P 550 € vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1200 € — P1P wins (+118%)
- Work area: P1P 256×256 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 160×160 mm — P1P wins (+156%)
- Max print speed: P1P 500 mm/s vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 100 mm/s — P1P wins (+400%)
- Build height Z: P1P 256 mm vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 145 mm — P1P wins (+77%)
- Max colors: P1P 16 vs 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer 1 — P1P wins (+1500%)
Which one to choose
Choose 2.0 A150 3-in-1 3D Printer if…
you value max bed temperature.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.