Atomstack Swift Laser Engraver vs Ortur R2 10W
Technical comparison · Diode laser (405–460 nm)
Swift Laser Engraver leads on the available specs (starting with price); R2 10W makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
Swift Laser Engraver
Atomstack
F2 · Intermediate
|
R2 10W
Ortur
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~150–280 € | 499 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | — | 47 × 40 × 21.4 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 2.83 kg | 10.5 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 300 × 300 mm | 300 × 210 mm |
| Power (W) | — | 144 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 24 V |
| Maximum speed | 400 mm/s | 20000 mm/min |
| Declared precision | 0.06 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Work area (short side) (mm) | 300 mm | 210 mm |
| Rated power (W) | — | 10 W |
| Source technology | Diode | Diode |
| Max travel speed (mm/s) | 400 mm/s | 333.33 mm/s |
| Max processing speed (mm/s) | 166.67 mm/s | 333.33 mm/s |
| Wavelength (nm) | — | 450 nm |
| Min resolution (µm) | 60 µm | — |
| Autofocus | False | False |
| Rotary included/compatible | False | False |
| Passthrough | — | False |
| Supported software | LightBurn, Other | Proprietary, LightBurn, Other |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The AtomStack Swift supports the most widely used laser control software, including LaserGRBL (free, Windows only) and LightBurn (paid, compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux). It connects via USB or Wi-Fi, providing excellent flexibility for sending g-code files directly to the machine. | It can be controlled via the proprietary Inspiraesth app for simplified operations, and natively supports standard software like LightBurn and LaserGRBL. |
The differences that matter
- Price: Swift Laser Engraver 215 € vs R2 10W 499 € — Swift Laser Engraver wins (+132%)
- Work area: Swift Laser Engraver 300×300 mm vs R2 10W 300×210 mm — Swift Laser Engraver wins (+43%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.