Artillery M1 Pro S1 vs Snapmaker 2.0 A350
Technical comparison · Fused filament fabrication (FFF/FDM)
M1 Pro S1 and 2.0 A350 are not direct competitors: very different prices (~5.1×). M1 Pro S1 costs less (~€322.5) and is the entry-level choice; 2.0 A350 offers more capability at a higher price (~€1650). Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
M1 Pro S1
Artillery
F2 · Intermediate
|
2.0 A350
Snapmaker
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | 2020 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~295–350 € | ~1500–1800 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 43.7 × 38.9 × 49.4 cm | 49.5 × 50.6 × 58 cm |
| Weight (kg) | — | 21.6 kg |
| Work area (mm) | 260 × 260 mm | 320 × 350 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 260 mm | 330 mm |
| Power (W) | 150 W | 320 W |
| Maximum speed | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Declared precision | 0.1 mm | 0.005 mm |
| Category specs | ||
| Footprint X×Y (short side) (mm) | 260 mm | 320 mm |
| Build height Z (mm) | 260 mm | 330 mm |
| Kinematics | CoreXY | Cartesian |
| Max nozzle temperature (°C) | — | 275 °C |
| Max bed temperature (°C) | 120 °C | 80 °C |
| Max print speed (mm/s) | 600 mm/s | 100 mm/s |
| Enclosed chamber | True | False |
| Filament sensor | — | True |
| Auto bed leveling | — | Mesh |
| Standard nozzle diameter (mm) | — | 0.4 mm |
| Multi-extruder | False | False |
| Native Klipper | False | False |
| Input shaper | — | False |
| Multicolor printing | True | False |
| Multicolor requires accessory | True | False |
| Max colors | — | 1 |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | Artillery OS, a Klipper-based system. Compatible with standard slicers like Cura, PrusaSlicer and OrcaSlicer via G-code. Supports Wi-Fi transfer, SD card and touchscreen control. Compared to closed platforms, it allows advanced adjustment of printing parameters, but lacks a native cloud ecosystem and requires manual slicer configuration. | The proprietary Snapmaker Luban software is designed to manage all three main functions of the machine (3D printing, laser processing, and CNC routing) within a single interface, significantly simplifying the workflow for users approaching mixed manufacturing. For pure 3D printing, the control board still accepts standard G-code generated by third-party slicers such as Ultimaker Cura or PrusaSlicer, providing advanced users with greater control over specific extrusion and movement settings. |
The differences that matter
- Price: M1 Pro S1 322.5 € vs 2.0 A350 1650 € — M1 Pro S1 wins (+412%)
- Max print speed: M1 Pro S1 600 mm/s vs 2.0 A350 100 mm/s — M1 Pro S1 wins (+500%)
- Work area: M1 Pro S1 260×260 mm vs 2.0 A350 320×350 mm — 2.0 A350 wins (+66%)
- Enclosed chamber: M1 Pro S1 yes, 2.0 A350 no
- Build height Z: M1 Pro S1 260 mm vs 2.0 A350 330 mm — 2.0 A350 wins (+27%)
Which one to choose
Choose M1 Pro S1 if…
you value price, max print speed and enclosed chamber.
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.