3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 PRO vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 PRO leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraMax Vario V900 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 PRO
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~6950–7050 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 66.04 × 86.36 × 91.44 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 20 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 415 × 405 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 500 mm | 290 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 200 mm/s | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The machine integrates a native web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for locally installed control software. The firmware manages the extruder's movement and dosing using protocols optimized for standard G-code. It is compatible with most 3D slicers, such as Cura or Slic3r, provided the piston extruder's flow parameters are correctly configured for high-viscosity materials. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 PRO 415×405 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 PRO wins (+169%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.