3D Potter 3D PotterBot 10 Micro vs Lithoz CeraMax Vario V900
Technical comparison · 3D printing with clay & ceramics
3D PotterBot 10 Micro leads on the available specs (starting with work area); CeraMax Vario V900 makes sense only for non-technical reasons (availability, support, ecosystem), or if the missing data matters in your case.
| Parameter |
3D PotterBot 10 Micro
3D Potter
F2 · Intermediate
|
CeraMax Vario V900
Lithoz
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~3499–3599 € | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 53.34 × 76.2 × 71.12 cm | 95 × 185 × 220 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 17 kg | — |
| Work area (mm) | 335 × 320 mm | 250 × 250 mm |
| Z-axis height (mm) | 305 mm | 290 mm |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Maximum speed | 130 mm/s | 8000 mm/s |
| Declared precision | — | 0.5 mm |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Cloud dependency | No | No |
| Software notes | The firmware natively manages the protocol via an integrated web interface accessible via WiFi or Ethernet, eliminating the need for dedicated applications. The machine is compatible with the main standard slicers on the market, which generate the G-code needed to control the piston extrusion system via standard printer commands. | The system uses proprietary software optimized for controlling polymerization parameters and managing ceramic material feeds. The workflow requires support for STL files or standard CAD formats, with granular control of layer thickness to ensure the component's structural integrity during the debinding and sintering process. |
The differences that matter
- Work area: 3D PotterBot 10 Micro 335×320 mm vs CeraMax Vario V900 250×250 mm — 3D PotterBot 10 Micro wins (+72%)
Which one to choose
MakerSpecs is an independent atlas. We don't sell products: this comparison links to both sheets, where you'll find complete data and official links.